DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAWAL RECORDE
Jot Ss. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Docket No: WR13148-14
1m January 9075
= wena Yoseen
Dear Sergeant ae
‘This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of titie 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
You requested completely removing the fitness report for
22 August 2012 to 31 March 2013.
It is. noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
Girected modifying the contested report by removing, from
section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional
comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] requires supervision for
daily tasks outside the norm and of a more complex nature." and
‘to round out his Military Occupation [sic] Specialty knowledge
and further develop his leadership abilities. Consider for
promotion.” and removing, from section K%.4 (reviewing officer's
comments), “[You have] 4 great attitude but performance wise
[you are] in the bottom third of all sergeants I have reviewed.
As stated above, [you need] placement at an IPAC [Installation
Personnel Administration Center], if possible, to further
cultivate [your] credibility and [your} leadership style.”
a three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 January 2015. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicabie to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval recoré and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 8 December 2014, a copy of which is
attached. The Board also considered your undated letter (faxed
5 January 2015. ,
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially .
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
Accordingly, your application for relief beyond that effected by
CMC has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’NETULL
Fxecutive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13149 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 December 2014, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11663 14
It is note@ that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “Future assignment should be within a unit whose mission allows further development of [your] mobility knowledge and sharpening of fyour] leadership sl:ilis.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4255 14
fitness report meets the criteria for derogatory material in Sect A, Item 6B and is rendered adverse IAW [in accordance with] MCO [Marine Corps Order] P1610.7F. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)} Performance Evaluation Review Board {PERB}), dated 31 March 2014 as amended by the HOMC e-mail dated 10 April 2014 with attachments, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1053 15
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2727 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps {CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “He requires more assistance in accomplishing non- Standard procedures. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09754 12
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying all four contested fitness reports, as follows: 1 August to 31 December 2009: From section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), remove “I fully expect MRO [Marine reported on] to continue making improvements and if he does” and “with his peers.” 26 June to 6 December 2010: From section K.4 (reviewing officer’s comments), remove “As a Sergeant of Marines MRO is still developing his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08259-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 2 November 2001 with enclosure, the advisory opinion from the HQMC Manpower Management Information Systems Division (MIFD), dated 11 December 2001 with enclosure, and the memorandum for the record dated 23 January 2002, copies of which are attached. The following comments/opinions concerning the page 11 entry 6 . on the Marine's grade, experience, position,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9152 14
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 5 April to 30 November 2007, and you impliedly requested removing your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 20615 Major Selection Board. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the advisory opinion in finding your selection by the FY 2015 promotion board would have been definitely unlikely, even if your record had reflected the modifications CMC has directed to the fitness report at issue. Consequently, when:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12997 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10350-08
concurred with the rd also considered your rebuttal letter dated ith enclosure. The Board could not find the reviewing officer (RO) lacked sufficient lobservation to evaluate you, noting observation need not be direct. Consequently, when) applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.